[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Often it is useful to add more text to the value of a variable already defined. You do this with a line containing ‘+=’, like this:
objects += another.o |
This takes the value of the variable objects
, and adds the text
‘another.o’ to it (preceded by a single space). Thus:
objects = main.o foo.o bar.o utils.o objects += another.o |
sets objects
to ‘main.o foo.o bar.o utils.o another.o’.
Using ‘+=’ is similar to:
objects = main.o foo.o bar.o utils.o objects := $(objects) another.o |
but differs in ways that become important when you use more complex values.
When the variable in question has not been defined before, ‘+=’ acts just like normal ‘=’: it defines a recursively-expanded variable. However, when there is a previous definition, exactly what ‘+=’ does depends on what flavor of variable you defined originally. See section The Two Flavors of Variables, for an explanation of the two flavors of variables.
When you add to a variable’s value with ‘+=’, make
acts
essentially as if you had included the extra text in the initial
definition of the variable. If you defined it first with ‘:=’,
making it a simply-expanded variable, ‘+=’ adds to that
simply-expanded definition, and expands the new text before appending it
to the old value just as ‘:=’ does
(see Setting Variables, for a full explanation of ‘:=’).
In fact,
variable := value variable += more |
is exactly equivalent to:
variable := value variable := $(variable) more |
On the other hand, when you use ‘+=’ with a variable that you defined
first to be recursively-expanded using plain ‘=’, make
does
something a bit different. Recall that when you define a
recursively-expanded variable, make
does not expand the value you set
for variable and function references immediately. Instead it stores the text
verbatim, and saves these variable and function references to be expanded
later, when you refer to the new variable (see section The Two Flavors of Variables). When you use ‘+=’ on a recursively-expanded variable,
it is this unexpanded text to which make
appends the new text you
specify.
variable = value variable += more |
is roughly equivalent to:
temp = value variable = $(temp) more |
except that of course it never defines a variable called temp
.
The importance of this comes when the variable’s old value contains
variable references. Take this common example:
CFLAGS = $(includes) -O … CFLAGS += -pg # enable profiling |
The first line defines the CFLAGS
variable with a reference to another
variable, includes
. (CFLAGS
is used by the rules for C
compilation; see section Catalogue of Implicit Rules.)
Using ‘=’ for the definition makes CFLAGS
a recursively-expanded
variable, meaning ‘$(includes) -O’ is not expanded when
make
processes the definition of CFLAGS
. Thus, includes
need not be defined yet for its value to take effect. It only has to be
defined before any reference to CFLAGS
. If we tried to append to the
value of CFLAGS
without using ‘+=’, we might do it like this:
CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -pg # enable profiling |
This is pretty close, but not quite what we want. Using ‘:=’
redefines CFLAGS
as a simply-expanded variable; this means
make
expands the text ‘$(CFLAGS) -pg’ before setting the
variable. If includes
is not yet defined, we get ‘ -O
-pg’, and a later definition of includes
will have no effect.
Conversely, by using ‘+=’ we set CFLAGS
to the
unexpanded value ‘$(includes) -O -pg’. Thus we preserve
the reference to includes
, so if that variable gets defined at
any later point, a reference like ‘$(CFLAGS)’ still uses its
value.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] |
This document was generated by Davide Tacchella on November 3, 2010 using texi2html 1.82.